|
Traditionally, wildlife officials have
managed human-bear conflict situations through hunting regulations,
destruction and relocation.
Thousands of bears are killed each year in North America.
Yet, these methods have not prevented conflicts or even
reduced their numbers.
As people move into bear country in unprecedented numbers, there is increased concern for public safety, biodiversity conservation and reducing property damage. The ineffectiveness of traditional response methods and the need to maximize resources point to a clear need for a new approach.
The key to successfully managing human-bear conflicts is to first minimize the number of human-bear conflict situations (through effective waste management, education and enforcement) and, secondly, to deal with any resulting conflicts in a non-lethal manner.
Non-lethal alternatives provide an effective management tool and incorporate a more holistic, long-term approach to bear management. This approach has met with huge success in areas like Mammoth Lakes, CA, Yosemite N.P., and Whistler, BC where the number of human-bear conflicts has dropped significantly - requiring less resources to deal with problem situations and less bears being destroyed.
Non-lethal Bear Management uses negative conditioning to
modify undesirable bear behaviour without destroying the
animal. By utilizing human dominance, and demonstrating
a body posture and vocalizations that speak the language
of the bear, officers can command the bear's respect and
reinstill its natural desire to avoid humans. These methods
can be reinforced with the use of bear dogs, rubber bullets,
pyrotechnics and bear pepper spray. Even hitting the bear with
rocks will work. Bears can be taught to stay away from people
and their property. This approach capitalizes on the bear's
innate tendency to avoid conflict and fit into the natural
dominance hierarchy. The bear is not physically hurt - it
is a psychological experience that reinstills their respect
for and hence avoidance of people.
Bears must be taught to respect humans and human territory. This is a trait that bears have lost over time through poor management strategies and a generally submissive reaction by people. We have baited bears with a food reward into human settlement areas and then punished them with death for accepting an easy meal.
It needs to be stressed that negative conditioning should aid, but not be a substitute for preventive measures that eliminate or reduce the potential for human-bear conflicts.
|